Our Wishes
— What We Hope to Achieve Through This Disclosure
This page explains what we, the bereaved family, hope to achieve by revealing the truth behind the medical accident, suspicious death, irregular postmortem procedures, and years of obstruction described on this website.
1. Why We Chose to Disclose This Information
For many years, we struggled alone with the knowledge that our father’s death was not the natural or unavoidable outcome we were told it was. The explanations we received contradicted medical principles, and the postmortem procedures contained multiple inconsistencies.
Yet, whenever we sought help — from lawyers, reporters, or institutions — we were met with silence, dismissiveness, or obstruction.
After more than a decade, we realized that:
Remaining silent would allow the same tragedy to happen to others.
We therefore chose to preserve every document, every recording, and every piece of evidence, and to make them public so that the truth can be independently verified.
2. What We Hope to Prevent
Our deepest wish is simple:
No other family should ever have to experience what we went through — medically, legally, or emotionally.
We hope to prevent:
- Medical accidents being concealed instead of addressed
- Irregularities in death certification or postmortem procedures
- Families being denied access to truth and accountability
- Obstruction of communication with lawyers or media
- Interference in daily life when seeking justice
If our father’s case had been handled properly, his life might have been saved — or at the very least, the cause of his death could have been clarified with dignity.
3. What Our Father Meant to Us
Our father was a gentle, hardworking man who supported our family with sincerity and kindness. He was someone who respected others, contributed to society, and lived his life honestly.
His final days — filled with suffering, contradictions in medical care, and irregularities in the postmortem process — were not what he deserved.
By revealing the truth, we hope to honor his memory and return to him the dignity that was taken away.
4. The Difficult Reality We Have Faced — Signs of Interference and Silence
Throughout the long process of seeking answers, we encountered situations that were difficult to interpret as mere coincidences.
Whenever we tried to move closer to the truth — whether by consulting lawyers, approaching journalists, requesting documents, or attempting to communicate with institutions — obstacles appeared repeatedly and in consistent patterns.
While we cannot identify who was responsible, the following experiences occurred over many years:
- Emails and documents to multiple reporters disappeared without reply
- Phone calls were redirected or abruptly stopped
- Postal mail containing evidence was returned opened
- Some lawyers refused consultation immediately after receiving our name
- Digital communication appeared to be obstructed at key moments
- Unusual individuals appeared around us during important discussions
Taken individually, any one of these events could be dismissed. But together, they formed a pattern that we could not overlook.
These experiences made it impossible for us to rely solely on institutions to reveal the truth.
This is why we decided to publish all documents and evidence ourselves, so that anyone — journalists, specialists, researchers — can independently examine the facts.
5. Why Independent Verification Matters
One of our most important wishes is that people will examine the evidence with their own eyes — not rely on assumptions, preconceived ideas, or institutional narratives.
We provide:
- Medical records and imaging data
- Recordings of physician explanations
- Police communication records
- Evidence preservation documents
- Handwriting comparisons
- Original receipts and forms
- Unopened vs. opened postal evidence
By making these materials public, we hope to allow anyone to verify whether the explanations we were given were consistent with the actual facts.
We believe that independent verification is essential for rebuilding trust in medicine, law, and public institutions.
6. Our Feelings Toward Those Involved
We want to be very clear:
We do not seek revenge against any individual.
Our objective is not to accuse or punish specific people, but to clarify what happened, prevent recurrence, and restore dignity to our father.
We understand that individuals working within institutions may themselves have been under pressure, lacking information, or unable to speak freely.
Therefore:
- We do not hold personal hostility toward any staff member
- We do not wish harm upon anyone involved
- We simply want the truth — and accountability where appropriate
Our goal is constructive:
To ensure that the systems meant to protect the public operate with fairness, transparency, and humanity.
7. What We Hope This Disclosure Will Achieve
Through sharing our experience, we hope to contribute to:
- Greater transparency in medical institutions
- Accurate and responsible handling of postmortem procedures
- Improved accountability in law enforcement and forensic processes
- Protection of families seeking answers after medical incidents
- Freedom for journalists to investigate without obstruction
- A society where truth is not silenced
We also hope that other families — who may be facing similar situations but feel afraid to speak — will find courage and strength from our story.
8. Our Request to Everyone Reading This
If you are reading this page, it means you took the time and emotional energy to learn about our father's case. For that, we would like to express our deepest gratitude.
We understand that the contents of this website may be difficult to process — not only because of the medical and legal complexity, but also because the events described go far beyond what most people expect to encounter in a developed society.
Nevertheless, we believe that awareness and understanding are the first steps toward preventing future tragedies.
If you are a journalist, investigator, medical professional, lawyer, researcher, or simply someone who cares about justice: your willingness to examine the evidence can make a real difference.
We ask for your support in whatever form is possible:
- Reading and verifying the primary documents
- Sharing this information with others who may help
- Providing expert insight into medical or legal aspects
- Offering journalistic or research-based analysis
- Helping ensure the information is preserved and not lost
Even small acts — such as sharing a link, verifying a document, or offering professional insight — can contribute to bringing truth to light.
9. A Message About the AI Commentary
An AI-generated third-party analysis is also available on this site. The purpose of the AI commentary is not to draw legal conclusions, but to provide an unbiased, logic-based evaluation of the evidence and highlight why the events described cannot be dismissed as misunderstandings.
The AI analysis was conducted without emotional influence, prejudice, or institutional pressure. It focuses solely on factual consistency and logical coherence.