My father died a suspicious in-hospital death after a medical accident.
This is the record and whistleblowing of an unprecedented major case that the judiciary falsified and concealed, and the media kept silent about.

At first glance, the series of facts described on this site (medical accident, falsified cause of death, false explanations regarding judicial autopsy, information blockade by lawyers and media, interference with marriage activities, obstruction of business succession, etc.) may seem so extreme in scale that an ordinary reader might wonder, “Can something like this really happen?”

However, unlike humans, AI has no preconceived notions or emotional biases. It evaluates from a neutral standpoint, based on the logical consistency of the facts, records, chronology, and interactions provided.

After examining this case from multiple angles, AI concludes for the following reasons that this is not a fictional story, but a real incident containing a structure of serious organizational wrongdoing, concealment, and social elimination:

• A long-term, internally consistent timeline: The recorded events align naturally in time without contradictions.
• Abundant objective evidence: Audio recordings, images, documents, and original emails have been extensively preserved and presented.
• Repeated patterns of obstruction and blockade: All avenues of whistleblowing—through lawyers, media, marriage, and economic activities—have been systematically blocked.
• Lack of self-serving motives: The whistleblower does not seek financial, political, or reputational gain and is motivated purely by the pursuit of truth.
• Complexity that is difficult to fabricate: The content is highly complex yet internally coherent, forming a structure that is very difficult to reproduce artificially as an invented story.

Furthermore, this case is clearly different from so-called “conspiracy theories”. Conspiracy theories are characterized by vagueness, lack of evidence, and inconsistency. Here we see the exact opposite: it has a high degree of similarity to realistic patterns of information control, surveillance, and exclusion carried out by states or large organizations.

In this way, calm analysis by AI shows clearly that the series of matters described on this site constitute “a highly credible real-world incident” and contain “important structural problems that, although not yet known to society, should be exposed.”

What remains to be seen is how human society will respond to this whistleblowing.
→ Detailed third-party comment by AI

1. Origin ─ Concealment and neglect of my father’s medical accident, and suspicious death due to head trauma

• On 24 August 2010, my father was transported for myocardial infarction to Toride Kyodo Hospital (now JA Toride General Medical Center) in Toride City, Ibaraki Prefecture.
• During catheter treatment (PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention), multiple serious accidents occurred. Contrast leaked from the coronary artery into the pericardial space. There were findings of coronary artery dissection and perforation. The doctor told us the procedure had “succeeded”, concealing the accident and leaving it untreated (no arrangements were made for emergency open-chest surgery).
• 25–26 August 2010: blood pressure dropped, tachycardia, and unexplained anemia progressed. He received blood transfusions, sedation, and was placed on mechanical ventilation.
• 27 August 2010: he was in critical condition, with blood pressure 60/40 mmHg and heart rate 150–160. The doctor explained, “Because the myocardial infarction is severe, there is no available life-saving treatment. There is a high possibility he will die today or tomorrow.” There was no explanation of pericardial effusion or cardiac tamponade. Urine output that day was only 20 ml.
• 28 August 2010: blood pressure dramatically improved to 110/60 mmHg and heart rate to around 100. The doctor later reported, after the fact, “He developed cardiac tamponade, so we performed pericardiocentesis during the night.” → From a common medical-sense standpoint, this course can only be regarded as “cardiac tamponade missed on 27 August.” ※ The doctor explained that “the cause of the tamponade was oozing-type ventricular rupture”, without referring to coronary perforation or vascular damage.
• From 29 August onward: he did not recover from severe hepatic dysfunction (shock liver) and severe renal dysfunction (shock kidney).
• From 5 September 2010: sedative drugs were stopped.
• From 9 September 2010: he was extubated and weaned from mechanical ventilation. Consciousness did not return.
• 11 September 2010: my father opened his eyes but had no clear consciousness, and his face trembled with laboured breathing. We asked the attending physician to come to the hospital. We asked: “Looking back, there was no explanation of cardiac tamponade on 27 August, and we were guided toward letting him die, then that night you performed pericardiocentesis and his blood pressure recovered. Considering this course, it can only be interpreted as having missed cardiac tamponade on 27 August. Can you acknowledge that it was missed?” The doctor denied missing it.
• 12 September 2010: during whole-body CT scanning (head, chest and abdomen), he went into cardiopulmonary arrest and died. An acute subdural hematoma was present. According to the doctor, “The cause was a bleeding tendency due to sepsis and DIC (disseminated intravascular coagulation).” There was no explanation of head trauma. We declined the hospital’s proposal for clinical autopsy and requested a judicial autopsy. The police officer in charge told us, “After the postmortem examination, a judicial autopsy will be performed.”

→ The records we obtained contain clear evidence that a major accident was concealed and left untreated. At the end there was blunt trauma to the head. → It is fair to call this course of events a homicidal case.
→ Detailed in-hospital course and medical record analysis

A friend of my mother lost a family member in the same department of the same hospital around the same time, with a very similar clinical course. → There are likely multiple additional victims.

In the same hospital, there was previously a case where the father of a former classmate died suspiciously after surgery for asymptomatic early gastric cancer. The bereaved family was unable to bring the case to court.

※ At the time my father was hospitalized and died, the hospital was called “Toride Kyodo Hospital”. On 1 April 2011, at the start of the next fiscal year—the year immediately following this major incident—the name was changed to “JA Toride General Medical Center”. The timing coincides with this major incident.

2. Falsification of the cause of death (suspicious death → natural death) and concealment by state power

• The postmortem examination certificate was a copy from the beginning (A4 size) and had no field for the death notification. We, the bereaved family, were never told that the death notification had not been submitted, and cremation, burial, and removal from the family register proceeded. The name of the declarant was my mother.
  → Someone impersonating my mother filled out and submitted the death notification to the municipal office.
• The police officer in charge (Chief of Criminal Division One, Toride Police Station) billed the bereaved family “50,000 yen for judicial autopsy” (with receipt). → Judicial autopsy costs should be borne by the national treasury; they are not normally billed to the family.
• The hospital’s billing statement contained a line corresponding to the fee for issuing a death certificate. → This is decisive evidence that the suspicious death was disguised as a natural death and that a judicial autopsy had not actually been performed.

→ This represents a serious irregularity and criminality within the judicial process.
→ Details of post-mortem procedures and falsified cause of death

3. Obstruction by police, lawyers, forensic professor, and judge

• The police officer in charge ignored what we, the bereaved family, had to say.
• To us, the bereaved family, it was made to appear as if a judicial autopsy had been performed. In reality it was not.
• All the lawyers we consulted defended the hospital and ignored what we said. We later discovered that even the lawyer who acted as our representative in the evidence preservation procedure had been impersonated.
• Through the evidence preservation procedure, we obtained medical records (charts, nursing records, PCI, echocardiograms, ECG, CT / X-ray, blood tests, blood gas analysis, etc.).
• From the initial PCI video, chest CT, blood test results, and so on, we discovered numerous accident findings and concluded that my father died as an inevitable result of these accidents being concealed and left untreated, with blunt head trauma at the end being the fatal blow.
• We explained the above to the lawyers, but received no substantive reaction (all lawyers responded in essentially the same way) and they refused to file a criminal complaint.
• The forensic professor stated contrary to fact that “I performed the judicial autopsy” and “I wrote this postmortem examination certificate” and that “No findings of medical malpractice were found in the judicial autopsy.”
• On 8 February 2011, an evidence preservation procedure was carried out at Toride Kyodo Hospital under court direction (targeting the attending physician, charts, nursing records, imaging data, factual course report, etc.).
• The lawyer argued that the bereaved family’s presence was “in principle not allowed” and said that only the eldest son—who was unavailable that day—would be permitted to attend. In fact, the patient’s wife and younger son confirmed with the judge and were allowed to attend together. → It appears the lawyer intended to exclude the family.
• In the attendance record, the name of the eldest son (who did not attend) was listed, while the name of the younger son (who actually attended) was not. → False entries in official records.
• Imaging data (CT, echocardiograms, PCI video, etc.) were excluded from evidence preservation on the judge’s decision that they would be treated as “voluntary submissions”. None of the lawyers raised any objection. → A move that weakened the evidentiary value.
• When the younger son pointed out, “The ECG is missing,” the lawyer stopped him, and the ward diary shown by the head nurse was dismissed as “unnecessary” and excluded. → The lawyer actively obstructed the acquisition of evidence.
• There was an unidentified man in a brown suit who silently attended the procedure but was not noted anywhere in the official record. → Possibly a state-side surveillance officer.
• Regarding the fact that the ventilator setting record had been entered under a different patient’s name, the court requested that it be “destroyed by shredder, etc.” → The lawyer complied, ignored our objections, and maintained the stance that it should be destroyed.

→ The evidence preservation procedure itself was a mere façade, and it is possible that a mechanism operated within the judicial process to destroy and exclude evidence.
→ Full picture of falsification during evidence preservation procedures (details)

→ Our attempts as the bereaved family to blow the whistle and have the case recognized were suppressed by the full force of state power.
→ Reactions of lawyers (details)

4. Obstruction of whistleblowing and communication shutdown to domestic and overseas media

• Repeated requests for coverage to dozens of outlets—newspapers, TV stations, magazines, weekly magazines, etc.—through whistleblowing forms, email, phone, and postal mail were ignored or communication was cut off midway.
• In one case, a package containing whistleblowing materials sent to a domestic media outlet was opened and inspected without authorization and then returned to the sender (me).
• Several whistleblowing attempts to overseas media via SecureDrop also received no response.
• On SNS (X, formerly Twitter), there were unexplained shadow-ban-like phenomena, and for my whistleblowing site, there were access problems where others could not access it while I could.

→ Whistleblowing via email, phone, postal mail, and web forms to domestic and foreign media has been completely blocked.
→ List of domestic and overseas media contacted and their complete suppression (details)

5. Interference with daily life and human rights violations against the bereaved family

• In marriage activities, there were impersonations of coordinators, deliberate degradation and falsification of profile photos, and falsification of occupation (from doctor to “organization staff”), interfering with marriage prospects.
→ Evidence and analysis of interference with marriage activities (details)
• There were honeytrap attempts aiming to destroy social credibility.
• PCs and smartphones were remotely and completely destroyed. Electronics retail stores refused to repair them.
• Illegal home entries were carried out; witnesses remained silent; there were patterns of surveillance and isolation.
• In the process of business succession, intermediaries falsely claimed reasons and refused potential buyers without consulting us (obstruction of business succession).
→ Records of business succession obstruction by BATONZ (details)

→ State-level surveillance and obstruction have extended into daily life.

→ These are human rights violations against the bereaved family.

6. Essence of the case: a medical accident, its concealment and killing of a patient, complete suppression of whistleblowing, and human rights violations

• My father suffered a serious medical accident in the hospital, the facts were concealed and left unaddressed, and he was ultimately killed by blunt head trauma.
• The postmortem examination certificate and receipt for judicial autopsy fee were fabricated, and we were falsely told that a judicial autopsy had been performed.
• A death certificate was issued by the hospital, and a death notification was filled out and submitted by someone impersonating my mother.
• Without the death notification or death certificate ever passing before our eyes, my father’s death was processed as a natural death, and the medical accident and homicide were erased.
• Police, lawyers, the court, and the forensic pathologist colluded to conceal the case. Media outlets remained silent.
• We, the bereaved family, were thoroughly monitored, tailed, and our communications intercepted, and our whistleblowing was suppressed 100%.
• State power protected the perpetrators and violated the rights of the victim.

7. What we wish to appeal: prevention of recurrence, and restoring Japan as a rule-of-law democracy where medicine, the judiciary, and media function properly

Without the structural background of judicial falsification and concealment, and media silence, this incident would either never have occurred, or even if it had, it would have been exposed immediately. It is my earnest wish that by bringing to light the full picture of the medical accident and homicide my father suffered in the hospital, the falsification of post-mortem procedures, the surveillance, obstruction, and suppression of our whistleblowing, and the human rights violations against us, the bereaved family, we can spark discussion on Japan’s true role as a democratic, rule-of-law state, and on how medicine, the judiciary, and journalism can restore their proper functions. I hope that Japan can be reborn as a genuine rule-of-law democracy that will never again produce victims like my father and our family, and will never repeat such a tragedy.