Obstruction of Marriage Activities
— Impersonation, Profile Manipulation, and Coordinated Interference

1. Background — Why Marriage Activity Became a Target

From around 2018, I noticed an unusual pattern: efforts to engage in ordinary social or personal activities were met with unexpected obstacles. This intensified after I began re-investigating my father’s medical accident and suspicious death.

Marriage agencies became one of the clearest areas where the interference was visible. The methods used were subtle but deliberate: altering my profile, impersonating coordinators, and blocking matches one after another.

2. 2018–2020 — Pre-Felice Period (Initial Irregularities)

During this early period, I was not yet aware that my marriage activities were being interfered with. However, looking back, several red flags were already present:

• Agencies frequently “lost” submitted documents
• Profiles displayed publicly did not match the ones I provided
• Coordinators changed abruptly without explanation
• Messages from potential partners disappeared from the system

At the time, I attributed these issues to system errors or administrative mistakes. Only later did the pattern become apparent.

3. 2021 — Joining Felice (Prime Marriage)

In 2021, seeking a more reliable service, I joined Felice (Prime Marriage), which specializes in
“high-level matching for professionals, especially doctors.”

However, the problems became far more serious here. I began to notice:

• Possible impersonation of a coordinator
• Contradictory explanations from agency staff
• Emails with unusual writing styles not matching the staff member’s identity
• A coordinator appearing via Zoom who did not resemble the person claimed

Below is a structured record of these incidents.

4. Suspected Impersonation of Felice Coordinators

During consultations, I interacted with three coordinators. The first and third were consistent in appearance and writing style. However, the second coordinator — who attended a Zoom meeting — did not match the real individual.

• The face did not match Felice’s official coordinator photos
• The speech pattern was markedly different
• Her explanations were inconsistent with Felice’s procedures
• Her emails contained writing habits not seen in legitimate staff messages

→ Strong suspicion of impersonation.

This was the first time I realized that something beyond normal staff turnover was occurring.

5. Email Style Analysis — Inconsistencies Suggest Multiple Writers

Several emails from “the same coordinator” showed distinct differences:

• Different punctuation habits
• Different use of honorifics
• Different sentence structure
• Unrelated phrases inserted unnaturally

These inconsistencies strongly suggest that the emails were written by different individuals using the same name.

6. Transition to Avenue Tokyo — New Irregularities

After the incidents at Felice, I moved to another agency under Prime Marriage: Avenue Tokyo. However, similar irregularities appeared almost immediately.

• The coordinator's communication was inconsistent
• Email writing style differed from message to message
• Meeting arrangements repeatedly failed without explanation
• The “supervisor” who intervened shared the exact same writing quirks as the coordinator

This led to the suspicion that multiple individuals were writing under the same coordinator name, and possibly also under the supervisor’s name.

7. Evidence of Impersonation — Writing Pattern Analysis

Through careful comparison of dozens of emails, clear writing-pattern signatures emerged:

• Unique punctuation patterns that matched across different supposed senders
• Recurring unnatural line breaks and spacing
• Identical misuse of certain Japanese honorifics
• Consistent mistyping of specific words, repeated across “different” staff

These patterns strongly support the possibility that:
• the “coordinator” and “supervisor” were the same person, or
• both were impersonated by the same third party.

Either scenario indicates fraudulent communication, along with deception toward paying clients.

8. Suspicious Profile Explanations — Fabricated Reasons

A recurring tactic was the use of vague or fabricated explanations to block introductions or matches.

Examples include:

• “The other party suddenly withdrew.” (without concrete reason)
• “Your profile seems too strong; it may intimidate others.” (contradicted by past results)
• “We have no suitable candidates this month.” (statistically improbable)
• “There was a system error.” (used excessively and without technical basis)

These explanations lacked consistency, transparency, and factual basis.

9. Attempted Matching Blockage — Systematic Pattern

The interference exhibited a consistent sequence:

1. Distort my personal information
2. Create a negative or misleading impression
3. Block introductions before they occur
4. Provide vague or contradictory excuses

Over time, this formed a pattern that resembled:
intentional suppression of my marriage prospects.

10. Transition to 2022 — New Phase of Interference

By 2022, multiple agencies had shown similar patterns. This raised serious concerns that the interference was not limited to a single coordinator or company, but rather:

coordinated across multiple organizations simultaneously.

This became even clearer in the next stage, with a different agency entirely: Musbell.

11. 2024 — Musbell: Direct Profile Tampering

Musbell presented the most blatant form of interference. Unlike Felice or Avenue Tokyo, where impersonation was the main issue, Musbell altered my official profile directly and without permission.

Examples of direct tampering:

• Occupation changed: “Physician” → “Company employee”
• Profile photos modified:
  • Artificial aging effects applied
  • Blurring or “face softening” to make the appearance worse
  • Color balance adjusted to reduce clarity
• Sent to potential partners without my approval

→ This significantly damaged my credibility and matching opportunities.

Additional suspicious behavior:

• Coordinators provided contradictory explanations
• Phone staff and email staff displayed identical writing habits
• Internal notes about me were inconsistent and sometimes false

The cumulative effect resembles deliberate sabotage of marriage activities.

12. Photo Evidence — Artificial Degradation

Side-by-side comparison of provided vs. published photos revealed:

• Brightness reduced
• Skin tone darkened
• Wrinkles artificially exaggerated
• Lower-resolution exports used intentionally

These alterations made me appear older, less healthy, and less favorable to potential partners.

These manipulations cannot be explained as “routine adjustments.”

13. AI Analysis — Third-Party Evaluation

AI analysis (based on email patterns, timeline structure, linguistic signatures, and behavioral anomalies) indicates:

• The impersonation incidents are highly unlikely to be coincidental
• Multiple agencies showed similar interference patterns
• Profile tampering at Musbell cannot be accidental
• The probability of ordinary administrative error is extremely low

Based on these factors, AI concludes that the events:
“Exhibit patterns consistent with intentional coordinated interference.”

14. Overall Conclusion — A Clear Pattern of Interference

Across multiple agencies over several years, the interference followed a consistent pattern:

1. Impersonation of coordinators or supervisors
2. Fabrication of explanations and false information
3. Alteration or distortion of my profile without permission
4. Artificial lowering of match quality and opportunities
5. Contradictory communication designed to create confusion
6. Systematic blocking of meetings and introductions

These actions substantially reduced my ability to form normal social or marital connections. The cumulative pattern strongly suggests:

intentional obstruction of marriage activities.

It is extremely unlikely that these repeated incidents across different companies occurred due to ordinary administrative mistakes.

15. Why This Matters — Human Rights Impact

Marriage is a fundamental part of personal freedom and dignity. Tampering with someone’s marriage activities — by impersonating staff, altering personal information, falsifying occupation, and degrading photos — represents:

• a violation of privacy
• an obstruction of personal autonomy
• social and psychological harm
• an attack on one’s future prospects

This type of interference has profound long-term consequences, particularly when combined with the medical incident, postmortem falsification, police irregularities, and media suppression described elsewhere on this site.

16. Message to Readers — Request for Support

I am sharing this information for the purpose of:

• raising awareness of the obstruction I experienced,
• seeking independent verification and investigation,
• preventing similar harm from occurring to others,
• calling for transparency and accountability in marriage agencies.

If you are a journalist, investigator, or a person who has experienced similar interference, I welcome your contact.

→ Contact information