Domestic & International Media Contact Attempts — Complete Silence and Systematic Shutdown
Over many years, our family repeatedly attempted to alert both domestic and international media to the medical accident, suspicious death, falsified postmortem documents, and the subsequent concealment involving the hospital, police, and legal actors. Despite contacting dozens of major newspapers, TV stations, weekly magazines, and foreign outlets, not a single organization pursued the case.
This page documents those attempts in detail, based on verifiable records such as:
- submission logs from official inquiry forms
- email evidence (timestamps, mail headers)
- postal records (including incidents involving unsealed mail)
- phone call attempts
- SecureDrop submissions to foreign media
The pattern—universal silence across all media channels—cannot be explained by coincidence.
1. Major Domestic News Outlets Contacted (All Ignored)
Listed below are the major Japanese media organizations we contacted. All were approached multiple times via online forms, email, postal mail, and phone calls, with no meaningful response.
Newspapers
- Yomiuri Shimbun
- Asahi Shimbun
- Mainichi Shimbun
- Nikkei
- Tokyo Shimbun
- Local papers (Ibaraki Shimbun, Jomo Shimbun, etc.)
TV Stations
- NTV
- TBS
- Fuji TV
- TV Asahi
- TV Tokyo
Weekly Magazines / Investigative Outlets
- 週刊文春 (Shukan Bunshun)
- 週刊新潮 (Shukan Shincho)
- 週刊現代 (Shukan Gendai)
- FLASH
- FRIDAY
- SPA!
- その他の調査報道系雑誌
Online Investigative / Independent Media
- Tokyo Shimbun investigative desk
- IWJ (Independent Web Journal)
- Litera
Result
No outlet followed up.
No questions, no interviews, no requests for documentation.
Not even automated confirmation replies were received from many outlets.
2. Structure of the Complete Media Shutdown
Despite contacting dozens of media outlets across multiple formats — online forms, direct email, postal mail, phone calls, and in-person attempts — not a single outlet responded in a meaningful way.
This silence displayed several notable patterns:
- No acknowledgment from online forms
- No replies to detailed emails
- No callbacks from phone attempts
- No requests for documentation
- Postal submissions returned unsealed (details below)
The consistency of these patterns across major organizations suggests not mere coincidence but a systemic information blockade.
3. Case Studies — Detailed Examples of Media Silence
Case 1 — Yomiuri Shimbun (読売新聞)
Yomiuri was contacted repeatedly via:
- official news tip form
- direct email to the local bureau
- postal mail containing summary documents
- phone calls requesting a reporter
Reaction:
- No replies of any kind
- No acknowledgment of receipt
- No returned calls from the news desk
Yomiuri is Japan’s largest newspaper by circulation; the total silence stands out.
Case 2 — “Sunday Mainichi” Weekly Magazine (サンデー毎日)
This outlet is known historically for investigative reporting. The family submitted:
- a full written summary of the case,
- supporting documents,
- a request for an investigative interview.
The result was complete silence. No questions, no confirmation, no follow-up.
This is notable because Sunday Mainichi often publishes medical and judicial investigative pieces.
Other Magazines (文春, 新潮, 現代, FRIDAY, FLASH, etc.)
Across all of them:
- Emails received no reply
- Form submissions produced no callbacks
- Postal submissions yielded silence
These outlets typically react quickly to high-impact investigative leads. The uniform silence is abnormal.
4. Postal Mail Incident — A Sign of Possible Interference
One submission to a domestic media company was returned to the sender unsealed (the glue flap opened) and inside a transparent envelope with a printed note stating:
“Delivered in this condition.”
However, the family is certain the envelope was fully sealed at the time of posting. The contents were intact but appeared to have been handled.
While no conclusion is asserted, the possibility of unauthorized inspection cannot be ruled out.
5. Attempts to Contact Foreign Media via SecureDrop
To avoid domestic suppression, the family submitted detailed case files via SecureDrop to several major international news organizations (names withheld here, but stored in the evidence archive).
Each submission included:
- a summary of the suspicious death,
- evidence of falsified postmortem documents,
- CT images and medical analysis,
- timeline and irregularities in the judicial process.
No replies were received from any outlet.
While SecureDrop does not guarantee a response, multiple submissions over years normally yield at least an acknowledgment or follow-up question.
6. Why Did No Media Organization Take Up the Case?
We cannot know the internal decisions of each newsroom. However, when all major outlets — across print, TV, weekly magazines, and online — uniformly ignore a case involving a suspicious death, falsified postmortem documents, and possible institutional misconduct, several hypotheses naturally arise:
- Editors may have judged the case to be “too sensitive” or “untouchable.”
- There may be informal pressure not to confront certain hospitals, police departments, or judicial actors.
- Newsrooms may fear legal or political backlash for covering systemic misconduct.
- Structural limitations in Japanese journalism (heavy reliance on official sources, press-club culture) may inhibit independent investigation.
We do not assert any single explanation as fact. Rather, we present the observable outcome: no one investigated, no one reported, and the case remained completely invisible to society.
7. What We Are Asking of Journalists and Media Organizations
We are not seeking financial compensation or publicity for ourselves. Our primary goals are:
- to clarify the truth of one person’s suspicious death,
- to expose structural problems in medical, police, and judicial systems,
- to prevent similar tragedies from happening again.
To that end, we ask journalists and media organizations to:
- review the primary documents and audio recordings presented on this site,
- independently verify the facts (medical charts, CT images, billing records, protocols, emails),
- interview relevant institutions and actors,
- and, if appropriate, report the case to the public in a fair and accurate manner.
We are prepared to provide:
- complete medical records (charts, nursing notes, PCI images, CT, lab results),
- copies of death certificates, death notifications, and billing documents,
- audio recordings of interactions with doctors, police, and lawyers,
- detailed timelines and analytical notes.
If you are a journalist, editor, or researcher willing to examine this case, please contact us via the following page:
8. For International Readers
For readers outside Japan, this page may appear to describe a situation that resembles a “media blackout” on a single case involving:
- a medical accident and suspicious in-hospital death,
- falsified postmortem documents,
- irregularities in police and judicial procedures,
- and subsequent interference in the daily life of the bereaved family.
We hope that international journalists, human rights organizations, and researchers specializing in freedom of expression, media systems, and rule of law will:
- treat this as a case study of systemic information suppression,
- compare it with similar cases in other countries,
- and, where possible, help bring independent scrutiny to the situation.
The English pages of this site are intended to facilitate such international examination by providing as much detail as possible in a widely accessible language.